In our experiments, subjects played five entry games with no feedback. If the number of entrants was above (less than or equal to) $d$, the entrants earned 0 ($1); nonentrants earned $.50. Subjects also played 22 matrix games with mixed equ…Kovalchik, Stephanie, Colin F. Camerer, David M. Grether, Charles R. Plott, and John M. Allman, “Aging and Decision Making: A Broad Comparative Study of Decision Behavior in Neurologically Healthy Elderly and Young Individuals,” Journal of …
Jack Ochs
economist · 2 mentions across 1 reading
In this course
Jack Ochs appears as a co-author on experimental economics research examining decision-making behavior in game theory settings, particularly around entry games and mixed-strategy equilibria. His work contributes empirical data on how human subjects deviate from rational actor assumptions in strategic choice scenarios, which grounds discussions in the course about the gap between idealized computational models and actual human behavior in networked systems. This empirical grounding is relevant to understanding how AI systems designed on game-theoretic or equilibrium assumptions encounter real-world complexity when deployed in social contexts.
Mentioned in 1 reading
Appears alongside
People mentioned in the same passages — sorted by co-occurrence weight.
Barry O'Neill 2Barry Sopher 2Dilip Mookerjee 2Wilfred Amaldoss 2Anatol Rapoport 1Benoit Proulx 1Bernard Lieberman 1Charles Holt 1Colin Camerer 1David Messick 1Erich Boebel 1Fang-Fang Tang 1Jacob Goeree 1Joseph Swierzbinski 1Ken Binmore 1Robert Bloomfield 1Thomas Palfrey 1Amnon Rapoport 1Bernhardt Lieberman 1Charles R. Plott 1Colin F. Camerer 1David M. Grether 1David M. Messick 1H. Solomon 1J. H. Criswell 1John M. Allman 1Mario Livio 1Nancy Stokey 1Patrick Suppes 1Paul Milgrom 1