Pandaemonium Architecture 6.0

In this course

Schaffer is a metaphysician whose work on ontological levelism—the idea that reality breaks neatly into discrete hierarchical levels—has become central to debates about how to conceptualize complex systems in the computational and cybernetic tradition. His critique (alongside Heil) of strict ontological levelism appears in discussions that distinguish between what actually exists at different scales versus how we productively *analyze* systems epistemologically, a distinction crucial for thinking about AI and machine learning architectures that operate across multiple representational levels. He's cited here less for a positive doctrine than as a sparring partner whose skepticism about hierarchical reality helps refine how contemporary systems theory avoids naive level-dependence while preserving level-based analysis as a methodological tool.

Mentioned in 1 reading

Luciano Floridi

The Method of Levels of Abstraction

3

Reality can be studied at different levels, so forms of “levelism” have often been advocated in the past.[^1] In the 1970s, levelism nicely dovetailed with the computational turn and became a standard approach both in science and in philoso…In this paper, I agree with Heil and Schaffer that ontological levelism is probably untenable. However, I shall also argue that epistemological levelism should be retained as a fundamental and indispensable method of conceptual analysis, if…Russell, B. (1902). Letter to Frege. In J. van Heijenoort (Ed.), From frege to gödel: A source book in mathematical logic, 1879–1931 (pp. 124–125). Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1967. Salthe, S. N. (1985). Evolving hierarchical s…

Appears alongside

People mentioned in the same passages — sorted by co-occurrence weight.