Pandaemonium Architecture 6.0

In this course

Ostrom is invoked here as a theorist of decentralized governance and commons management who demonstrated how communities self-organize outside hierarchical state control. The course readings use her work to argue against Scott's critique of top-down simplification, suggesting that Ostrom provides an empirical and historical model for heterarchical organization—systems where power is distributed rather than concentrated—that can inform contemporary thinking about AI governance and collective decision-making in networked systems.

Mentioned in 1 reading

Carole L. Crumley

Heterarchy

5

a mathematical standpoint heterarchy is the more general category and subsumes hierarchy as a special case (von Goldammer et al., 2003). While heterarchy may be modeled mathematically, it need not rely on mathematical or spatial representat…As Scott (1987, 1999, 2012) demonstrates in his analysis of progress—and simplification-driven goals of the state, governing elites devalue local knowledge and undermine individuals’ capacities for self-governance. This hyper-hierarchical, …As Scott (1987, 1999, 2012) demonstrates in his analysis of progress—and simplification-driven goals of the state, governing elites devalue local knowledge and undermine individuals’ capacities for self-governance. This hyper-hierarchical, …

+2 more

Appears alongside

People mentioned in the same passages — sorted by co-occurrence weight.