Furthermore, if the Poisson-CH model is correct for a given game, then the best response the theory dictates corresponds to what the highest-step thinkers do. Thus, the economic value of Poisson-CH can be interpreted as the marginal payoff …The main contribution is showing that the same model can explain limited equilibration in dominance-solvable games (like p-beauty contests) and the surprising accuracy of Nash equilibrium in some one-shot games, such as simultaneous binary …
Siméon Denis Poisson
mathematician · 2 mentions across 1 reading
In this course
Poisson appears here primarily through the Poisson-CH model, a framework used in behavioral game theory to explain how players with limited cognitive depth make strategic decisions in one-shot games. The excerpts reference this model's capacity to capture both bounded rationality (limited equilibration in dominance-solvable games) and surprising predictive accuracy in certain strategic settings, suggesting that Poisson distributions or processes underlie how players approximate optimal play without full backward induction. The model's relevance to the course lies in its demonstration of how mathematical formalisms from classical probability can mediate between idealized economic rationality and actual human cognition—a key tension between algorithmic systems and embodied intelligence.
Mentioned in 1 reading
Appears alongside
People mentioned in the same passages — sorted by co-occurrence weight.