Recently, however, there has been a proliferation of organizations aiming to build AGI and asserting that their products are close to achieving it (Bubeck, et al., 2023; Cuthbertson, 2022). While a number of researchers have debated whether…Timnit Gebru and Margaret Mitchell, 2022. “We warned Google that people might believe AI was sentient. Now it’s happening,” Washington Post (17 June), at https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/06/17/google-ai-ethics-sentient-lemoine-w…
Siddharth Suri
scientist · 2 mentions across 1 reading
In this course
Suri appears in the course readings primarily through association with AI ethics and corporate accountability research, though his specific contributions are not detailed in the provided excerpts. The first excerpt positions him within broader debates about AGI claims and methodological validity, suggesting he engages with questions of whether contemporary AI systems genuinely approach artificial general intelligence. His work appears to inform critical perspectives on corporate AI narratives, particularly in relation to the kind of public discourse warnings that figures like Gebru and Mitchell have raised about AI sentience and corporate accountability.
Mentioned in 1 reading
Appears alongside
People mentioned in the same passages — sorted by co-occurrence weight.
Timnit Gebru 2Adas Veitas 1Ben Goertzel 1Chris Murphy 1Eliezer Yudkowsky 1Linda Gottfredson 1Margaret Mitchell 1Mary Gray 1Nick Bostrom 1Nick Weaver 1Sam Altman 1Sharon Goldman 1Thomas Germain 1Blaise Agüera y Arcas 1Cuthbertson 1David Silver 1Emily M. Bender 1Hanna 1Jiang 1Khan 1Mary L. Gray 1Peter Norvig 1Sebastien Bubeck 1Shah 1Shevlin 1Williams 1