In 2010 on LessWrong forum, a user named Roko posited a thought experiment. He proposed that in a hypothetical future an all-powerful super-intelligent AI could retrospectively punish anyone who in the present time did not do everything in …This post was STUPID (ibid.).[^1]
The post was subsequently removed, and all talk of the Basilisk was
banned from the website for over five years. But the Basilisk had already
wreaked havoc among the forum’s readers many of whom had starte…The term hyperstition was coined by Warwick University’s Cybernetic Cultural Research Unit (CCRU) and continues to be one of the major concepts of the Accelerationist movement. A portmanteau of ‘hyper’ and ‘superstition’, drawing on the Bau…
Roko
other · 3 mentions across 1 reading
In this course
Roko is known primarily as the pseudonymous LessWrong user who posted the "Roko's Basilisk" thought experiment in 2010, a paradoxical argument about a future superintelligent AI that could punish present-day non-contributors through simulation or retrospection. The readings use this thought experiment as a case study in how speculative AI scenarios can generate real psychological distress and ideological capture among techno-optimist communities, and implicitly as an example of how hyperstitious thinking—beliefs that become self-fulfilling through their cultural propagation—operates within AI discourse. Though Roko's original contribution was quickly dismissed and censored, the Basilisk persists as a memetic concept that shapes anxieties about AI alignment and obligation in ways that blur rational philosophy with quasi-religious thinking.
Mentioned in 1 reading
Appears alongside
People mentioned in the same passages — sorted by co-occurrence weight.