Peter Sloterdijk
philosopher · 3 mentions across 1 reading
In this course
Sloterdijk emerges here as a critical counterpoint to cybernetic rationality, arguing that panic and proximity to chaos are not failures of social systems but foundational to them—a claim that troubles the cybernetic aspiration for total transparency and control. The readings deploy him against the idea that civilization requires the elimination of panic, suggesting instead that modern systems precariously depend on the very destabilization they claim to engineer away. His work thus opens space to think affect, embodiment, and the irrational as irreducible to cybernetic logic.
Mentioned in 1 reading
Appears alongside
People mentioned in the same passages — sorted by co-occurrence weight.