Contributors to Pennachin and Goertzel (2007b) outlined a number of potential reasons for the dearth of AGI research, one of them being that “a great number of researchers reject the validity or importance of ‘general intelligence.’ For man…We thank Alexander Thomas, Beth Singler, Douglas Rushkoff, Emily M. Bender, Jacob Metclaf, Jenna Burrell, Katherine Heller, Keira Havens, Remmelt Ellen, Samy Bengio, Syed Mustafa Ali, Nicholas Rodelo, and the anonymous reviewers for First M…
Pennachin
other · 2 mentions across 1 reading
In this course
Pennachin appears primarily as a co-author (with Goertzel) of a foundational 2007 work examining obstacles to artificial general intelligence research, particularly the theoretical disagreement within the field about whether "general intelligence" is a valid or meaningful concept. The reading invokes this work to ground a discussion of why AGI remains marginalized in academic AI research despite its conceptual importance. Pennachin functions here as a scholarly checkpoint for understanding the historical and epistemic divisions within AI science itself.
Mentioned in 1 reading
Appears alongside
People mentioned in the same passages — sorted by co-occurrence weight.
Alexander Thomas 1Bashford 1Beth Singler 1Douglas Rushkoff 1Emily M. Bender 1Fogarty 1Francis Galton 1Gaca 1Goertzel 1Harris 1Jacob Metclaf 1Jenna Burrell 1Katherine Heller 1Keira Havens 1Levine 1Markoff 1Nicholas Rodelo 1Norvig 1Osborne 1Remmelt Ellen 1Russell 1Sam Altman 1Samy Bengio 1Syed Mustafa Ali 1Zuberi 1Ben Goertzel 1Eliezer Yudkowsky 1Shane Legg 1