Pandaemonium Architecture 6.0

In this course

I cannot reliably identify Chomsky's actual role in this course from these excerpts—they appear to discuss formal language, semantics, and universes of discourse without clearly attributing core arguments to him. The excerpts seem to reference De Morgan, Dutilh Novaes, and Bateson, but Chomsky's presence is unclear or may be indirect. To write accurate notes on his significance to "Pandaemonium Architecture 6.0," I'd need excerpts where his work is more directly engaged.

Mentioned in 3 readings

Reza Negarestani

from Intelligence and Spirit

2

In its specialized format as the infrastructure of all theoretical structurations of the world, language is essentially formal. The significance of formal languages lies in their capacity for what Catarina Dutilh Novaes terms ‘desemantifica…[^49]: The term ‘universe of discourse’ originates from Augustus De Morgan’s phrase universe of a proposition specifically meaning ‘the whole of some definite category of things which are under discussion’ but not at all ‘the totality of al…

Paul M. Churchland

Eliminative Materialism

1

they may not die at all. Even so, it is not inconceivable that some segment of the population, or all of it, should become intimately familiar with the vocabulary required to characterize our kinematical states, learn the laws governing the…

Yuk Hui ChatGPT

or the Eschatology of Machines - Journal #137

1

[^12]: Brian Cantwell Smith, The Promise of Artificial Intelligence: Reckoning and Judgment (MIT Press, 2019). I engaged more with Smith’s argument in chapter 3 of Art and Cosmotechnics (e-flux and University of Minnesota Press, 2021). [^1…

Appears alongside

People mentioned in the same passages — sorted by co-occurrence weight.