Our theories of perceptual categorization must be informed by explicit dynamical models of perceptual evolution, models such as those studied in evolutionary game theory [14, 26, 33]. Our perceptual categories are shaped inter alia by facto…Most experts assume that perception estimates true properties of an objective world. They justify this assumption with an argument from evolution: Natural selection rewards true perceptions. I propose instead that if true perceptions crop u…the Rear-Mirror: Romantic Aesthetics, Culture, and Science Seen from Today. Festschrift for Frederick Burwick on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday, ed. W. Pape (WVT, Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier: Trier) (Studien zur Englischen Roma…
Louis Narens
scientist · 3 mentions across 1 reading
In this course
Louis Narens appears primarily as a passing reference in these course materials, cited in the context of evolutionary and perceptual theory but without substantial elaboration in the excerpts provided. The citations suggest his work contributes to debates about whether natural selection favors accurate perception or adaptive fitness-maximizing distortions—a key concern for understanding how AI systems might learn differently from biological organisms shaped by evolutionary pressures. His theoretical framework seems relevant to the seminar's investigation of perception, representation, and the gap between objective reality and evolved/trained models.
Mentioned in 1 reading
Appears alongside
People mentioned in the same passages — sorted by co-occurrence weight.
Natalia L. Komarova 2Steven Pinker 2Alva Noë 1D. Heyer 1Dale Purves 1Donald D. Hoffman 1Evan Thompson 1Frederick Burwick 1J.K. Regan 1K.A. Jameson 1Martin A. Nowak 1Michele Mosca 1P. Kaye 1R. B. Lotto 1Rainer Mausfeld 1Raymond Laflamme 1Stephen E. Palmer 1Steve Lehar 1Vilayanur S. Ramachandran 1W. Pape 1Dorothea Jameson 1Michael S. Diehl 1William Geisler 1Brian Marion 1Brian Skyrms 1Carol Skrenes 1Chetan Prakash 1Duncan Luce 1Geoff Iverson 1John Serences 1