My aim in this book, however, is not to remain authentically faithful to the philosophy of Hegel, or that of German Idealism—or for that matter to any other philosophy or philosopher. Philosophy is ‘its own time apprehended in thoughts’,[^3…[^67]: See R. Brandom, Reason, Genealogy, and the Hermeneutics of Magnanimity (2014), <http://www.pitt.edu/brandom/downloads/RGHM%202012-11-21%20a.docx>; and Brassier, ‘Dialectics Between Suspicion and Trust’, 98–113.
[^68]: Hegel, Phenome…
Jay Rosenberg
philosopher · 2 mentions across 1 reading
In this course
Without a Wikipedia summary, Rosenberg's precise identity here remains unclear from these fragments, but the excerpts suggest engagement with Hegelian philosophy and idealist thought in dialogue with contemporary figures like Brandom and Brassier. The citations appear in a broader argument about philosophy's relationship to its historical moment and the hermeneutic problems of dialectical reasoning. This signals Rosenberg may be functioning as either a philosophical interlocutor in debates about German Idealism's contemporary relevance or as a passing reference in a genealogical argument about suspicion and interpretive trust.
Mentioned in 1 reading
Appears alongside
People mentioned in the same passages — sorted by co-occurrence weight.