Take Nietzsche's treatment of God, for instance. What Nietzsche says is that God is dead. This is a far more interesting situation than if Nietzsche were to simply say "there is no God" or "God has never existed", etc. -- that would be mere…T.C./D.K.: To play the devil's advocate, there does seem to be, in this text, both an ethical vocabulary, implying a position to be adopted, and a more or less urgent directive to come to grips with the indistinguishability between the real…
J.B.
other · 2 mentions across 1 reading
In this course
Without more context, J.B. appears to be a conversational participant or interlocutor in the course readings rather than a major theorist. They seem to function as a voice raising critical questions about the text's ethical stakes and the blurred boundary between simulation and reality, possibly pushing back against claims about technological determinism or the collapse of referentiality. Their interventions are brief but serve to ground abstract theoretical arguments in questions about what we're actually supposed to *do* with these ideas in a world where the real and the simulated have become difficult to distinguish.
Mentioned in 1 reading
Appears alongside
People mentioned in the same passages — sorted by co-occurrence weight.