Personalised service rising to meet the commitment to transparency also means surging control: when deployed incentives are calibrated by perfect knowledge of their subjects, it is difficult to see opportunities for deviation from the algor…Noyes, J. 2018. ‘Australians Can Now Find Out if their Portrait is in an Art Museum Thanks to Google’, Sydney Morning Herald, 8 January. www.smh.com.au/technology/australians-can-now-find-out-if-their-portrait-is-in-an-art-museum-thanks-to-…
Inna Semetsky
philosopher · 2 mentions across 1 reading
In this course
I cannot locate substantive references to Inna Semetsky in the excerpts provided. The first excerpt attributes an argument about algorithmic control and transparency to Palmås, while the second is a news citation about Google's art museum matching tool—neither appears to directly engage Semetsky's work. Without clear textual evidence of how Semetsky is being mobilized in the course readings, I cannot write an accurate 2-3 sentence note explaining her relevance to "Pandaemonium Architecture 6.0." Please provide excerpts where Semetsky is actually cited or discussed.
Mentioned in 1 reading
Appears alongside
People mentioned in the same passages — sorted by co-occurrence weight.